Compare · Connectors, components and data-center power
Amphenol vs TE Connectivity
Amphenol vs TE Connectivity: which one is bigger, grows faster and keeps more of each dollar of revenue?
Amphenol: 1.3× TE Connectivity’s revenue
Method and sources
- Revenue growth (1 year): Amphenol 51.7% (FY2025), TE Connectivity 8.9% (FY2025)
- Revenue growth (3-year CAGR): Amphenol 22.3% (FY2025), TE Connectivity 2.0% (FY2025)
- Operating margin: Amphenol 25.4% (FY2025), TE Connectivity 18.6% (FY2025)
- Gross margin: Amphenol 36.9% (FY2025), TE Connectivity 35.2% (FY2025)
- Net margin: Amphenol 18.5% (FY2025), TE Connectivity 10.7% (FY2025)
- FCF margin: Amphenol 19.0% (FY2025), TE Connectivity 18.6% (FY2025)
Latest fiscal year per company: Amphenol FY2025, TE Connectivity FY2025. Fiscal years end on different dates, so years are not calendar-aligned.
Both report in USD. Amounts are as filed, not converted.
Why this pair: same peer group, revenue within 4x in the same currency. Peer groups are curated by hand from each company's business as described in its own 10-K/20-F (what it sells, not its SIC code). A company can sit in more than one group. Within a group, a pair is listed when both companies report in the same currency and the larger company's latest fiscal-year revenue is at most 4x the smaller one's; each company keeps its 4 nearest peers by revenue ratio. Companies reporting in different currencies are never size-matched (amounts are not converted); a short list of obvious same-industry pairs across currencies is added by hand, with the reason, as are two direct competitor pairs outside the size rule (AMD vs NVIDIA, Intel vs NVIDIA).
Derived = calculated by Hollsteen from reported SEC values; reported = as tagged in the filing. SEC filings only, no market data.
Side by side: all values with filing links
| Metric | Amphenol FY2025 | TE Connectivity FY2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $23.1B10-K · Feb 11, 2026 | $17.3B10-K · Nov 10, 2025 |
| Revenue growth (1 year) | 51.7% derived10-K · Feb 11, 2026 | 8.9% derived10-K · Nov 10, 2025 |
| Revenue growth (3-year CAGR) | 22.3% derived10-K · Feb 11, 2026 | 2.0% derived10-K · Nov 10, 2025 |
| Gross margin | 36.9% derived10-K · Feb 11, 2026 | 35.2% derived10-K · Nov 10, 2025 |
| Operating margin | 25.4% derived10-K · Feb 11, 2026 | 18.6% derived10-K · Nov 10, 2025 |
| Net margin | 18.5% derived10-K · Feb 11, 2026 | 10.7% derived10-K · Nov 10, 2025 |
| Free cash flow | $4.4B derived10-K · Feb 11, 2026 | $3.2B derived10-K · Nov 10, 2025 |
| FCF margin | 19.0% derived10-K · Feb 11, 2026 | 18.6% derived10-K · Nov 10, 2025 |
| R&D as % of revenue | 2.8% derived10-K · Feb 11, 2026 | 4.0% derived10-K · Nov 10, 2025 |
| Stock-based compensation as % of revenue | 0.6% derived10-K · Feb 11, 2026 | 0.9% derived10-K · Nov 10, 2025 |
Definitions: Revenue = Total revenue; Revenue growth (1 year) = Revenue FYt ÷ revenue FYt−1 − 1; Revenue growth (3-year CAGR) = (Revenue FYt ÷ revenue FYt−3)^(1/3) − 1; Gross margin = Gross profit ÷ revenue; Operating margin = Operating income ÷ revenue; Net margin = Net income ÷ revenue; Free cash flow = Operating cash flow − capital expenditures (one formula for all companies); FCF margin = Free cash flow ÷ revenue; R&D as % of revenue = Research and development expense ÷ revenue; Stock-based compensation as % of revenue = Stock-based compensation ÷ revenue.
More on each company
Amphenol
TE Connectivity
More connectors, components and data-center power comparisons: Amphenol vs Corning · Amphenol vs Vertiv · Corning vs TE Connectivity · Corning vs Vertiv · TE Connectivity vs Vertiv